Independent V&V

Evidence that your critical systems do what they are supposed to do, from a partner with nothing riding on the answer.

When Failure Is Not Recoverable

In safety-critical and mission-critical systems, a defect found in production is not a bug report. It is an incident, a recall, a grounded fleet or a regulatory finding. Independent verification exists because development teams inherently carry blind spots in the systems they build.

We build nothing
we assess

Independent assessment and validation, with no involvement in the development of the systems we verify.

Verification, Validation, and the Difference Between Them

Verification asks whether the system was built correctly against its requirements. Validation asks whether those requirements were the right ones in the first place. Independent means both are answered by an organization outside the delivery chain, reporting to you rather than to the program.

v v 1
independent 1 m
Our Independent V&V Capabilities

Five verification services, delivered on their own or as a continuous engagement alongside a program.

+Full-Scope IV&V on Critical Programs

Continuous independent verification across the life of a program, from requirements through acceptance.

+Independent Testing / QA as a Service

A test function that reports to you, not to the team whose work it is testing.

+Safety Critical V&V

Verification against DO-178C, ISO 26262, IEC 62304 and EN 50716, at the level of evidence a certification authority expects.

+AI System Validation

Model and agentic system behavior validated against intended use, including the failure modes that only appear at scale.

+Certification & Accreditation

Evidence packages assembled, traced and defended through the certification process.

V&V Approach

Independent verification only works if the independence is structural. Ours is built into how we engage.

[01]
Separate reporting line

We report to you or to the program authority, never through the development organization

[02]
Requirements-based verification

Every test traces to a requirement, and every requirement to a test. Coverage is demonstrable, not asserted.

[03]
Evidence as a deliverable

Artifacts are produced in the form an auditor or certification body will ask for.

[04]
Continuous engagement

Verification runs alongside development rather than after it, so findings arrive while there is still time.

Where Independent Verification Is Not Optional

In some sectors independent V&V is a regulatory requirement. In others it is simply the only way to know. We work across both.

Aerospace & Defense

Certification-bound systems verified against DO-178C and DO-254 objectives.

Healthcare & MedTech

Device software verified against IEC 62304 and MDR expectations, with the evidence trail a notified body will follow.

Automotive & Rail

Functional safety verified against ISO 26262 and EN 50716, across software that ships at scale or runs for decades.

Energy & Critical Infrastructure

Control and operational systems verified where an outage carries national consequence.

Public Sector

Independent acceptance testing of what vendors have delivered, before it goes live.

Technical Expertise

The capabilities from our technical framework that Independent V&V draws on most.

Quality & Testing
Product Architecture & Engineering
Compliance & Governance
AI-Driven Development / Agentic AI Integration
Continuous Improvement
Get an answer
you can defend.
Independent verification, scoped to your program and reported to you.